The more firms get from obligation as opposed to issuing stocks, the more it can diminish the aggregate cost of capital in light of the fact that the enthusiasm from obligation is duty deductible which will help reduce the aggregate cost of capital. In any case, no firm can get from obligation everlastingly in light of the fact that, at one point in time, extra obligation financing will make the aggregate cost of capital increment rather than decline. So firms will get in view of their own enhanced capital structure to limit the aggregate cost of capital however much as could reasonably be expected. Also, in light of this upgraded capital structure, there is a point of confinement to how much a firm can keep getting from obligation.
Answer:
$134,546
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the projected operating cash flow for this project
Projected operating cash flow=
{[820 × ($719 − 435)] + [(1,040 − 1,120) × ($369 − 228)] − $23,100} × {1 − .34} + {$10,400 × .34}
Projected operating cash flow={[820 × $284)] + [$80 × $141] − $23,100} × {.66} + {$3,436}
Projected operating cash flow= $134,546
Therefore the projected operating cash flow for this project is $134,546
Reserves - $20,000
Checkable Deposits - $200,000
Reserves Ratio - 10
Household Deposit - $15,000
Level of Excess Reserves - ?
Solution:
Checkable Deposits = $200,000 + $15,000 = $215,000
Required Reserves = 0.10 x $215,000 = $21,500
Excess Reserves = Actual Reserves - Required Reserves
= $35,000 - $21,500 = $13,500
<span>There is no clearly defined question and grammatical errors are in the text above. That said, the text begs the question why does Edmund consume cassettes? The answer is that the cassettes attract billy goats and the goats eat the garbage. Edmund can earn a living as long as each $6 cassette attracts enough of the goats to consume 3 garbage sacks. To be profitable, one cassette must attract enough goats to consume 4 sacks of garbage.</span>
Answer:
- Sole Proprietorship
- Partnership
- Limited Partnership
- Limited Liability Company
Explanation:
Sole Proprietorship is the type of business in which the liability is not limited. Due to this issue, the owner is solely responsible to pay off the debts of company from his personal owned assets if the business goes bankrupt.
Partnership is just like sole proprietorship but here the partners are the only responsible persons to payoff the debt of the company because the liability is limitless. The burden of the company debts is equally shared among the partners.
Limited Partnership is less risky because the liability is limited and only the amount invested in the business is subjected to the payment of borrowings from the lenders. The limited partner is responsible for his actions which means if his misdeed resulted in fine then it would be paid from his share first and then the other partners are equally liable to for compensation if their is still any amount left.
In the case of Limited liability company, the liability is limited and the burden of the payment of the liability falls on the company. So the investor is not subjected to pay the debts of the company because the limited liability company is a separate entity and is solely liable to pay for its debts.
