1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arada [10]
3 years ago
10

Why didn’t North Korea get to keep the land it temporarily captured in South Korea?

History
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
6 0
Because South Korea wasn’t havin it they wasss like heck nawwww
You might be interested in
What does Lincoln mean when he says soldiers have the last full measure of devotion
katrin [286]
Lincoln means that the soldiers were willing to die, to give their lives out of love and devotion
3 0
3 years ago
How would the boycott have affected African American workers, both male and female?
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

The boycott would have cut off their transportation to and from work. As well as anywhere they could not get to on foot. Leading to possible job losses and in turn losing the ability to pay for their homes and food.

4 0
3 years ago
How did imperialism lead to growing disorder in Europe?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The right answer is : "It led to competition between nations for colonies."

Explanation:

There was a fierce competition among European powers to conquer and colonize new territories, especially in Africa and in Asia. Having colonies was a necessary condition to be seen as a great power, a question of status and image. Britain and France had the largest colonial empires. Germany achieved reunification and quick industralization ensued. The German empire  came a little late to the colonial division of the world, and a desire to have more colonies was part of their motivation - together with other factors, for sure - in German policies before the start of WWI.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which landmark case did the Supreme Court rule that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information
Leni [432]
The correct answer is B) New York Times v. United States. It meant that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information that would directly imperil the country's war effort.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One major difference between McPherson's and Horwitz's historical interpretation of the Civil War.
TiliK225 [7]
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The issues that caused sectionalism to develop were:
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the Code Talkers stay in the military after the war was over?
    5·2 answers
  • In India's caste system, which group was considered the lowest caste? A. Vaishyas B. Shudras C. Kshatriyas D. Brahmans
    7·2 answers
  • During her husband's presidency, Eleanor Roosevelt believed that New Deal work programs should not include women
    15·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP!!!!! GETTING TIMED
    13·1 answer
  • Star a is farther away from earth than star b
    6·1 answer
  • Whywhy did the European population grow rapidly in the 1800s​
    15·1 answer
  • Write a difference between ancient historiography and medieval historiography.​
    7·1 answer
  • Do you feel you have the courage to stand up and protect other people who are being persecuted during the holocaust? Would you a
    9·1 answer
  • 3. Which country has Democratic Socialism? United States Norway Iran​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!