Answer:
$77.34
Explanation:
The computation of the current stock price is shown below:
But before that following calculations need to be done
EPS for year 2 = Dividend at year 2 ÷ Payout Ratio
= $1.96 ÷ 0.40
= $4.90
Now the price at year 2 is
Price at year 2 ÷ EPS at year 2 = PE ratio
Price at year 2 ÷ $4.90 = 18.95
Price at year 2 = $92.855
Now finally the current stock price is
= Dividend at year 1 ÷ (1 + rate of interest) + Dividend at year 2 ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^2 + Price at year 2 ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^2
= $1.81 ÷ 1.119 + $1.96 ÷ 1.119^2 + $92.855 ÷ 1.119^2
= $77.34
C you’re taking a class to show you want to have more skill
Answer:
The correct answer is Resources of the company equal creditors' and owners' claims to those resources.
Explanation:
It can be used to determine that the income or income of the consumer is exactly equal to the expense (purchase) of goods, for the determined period of consumption. In other words, by adding the value spent on the acquisition of goods "x" and goods "y". To have such values it is enough to multiply the number of possible units to acquire - in each of the points - by their respective price and then add them; This can be done at any point in the price line.
Skin antisepsis kits having alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination.
<h3>Skin antisepsis kits</h3>
Skin preparation is an important factor in declining the rate of blood culture contamination. We evaluated blood culture contamination rates associated with the use of skin antisepsis kits including either 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate or 2% alcoholic tincture of iodine.
Contamination of blood cultures is a typical problem, with rates for organizations ranging from 2% to more than 6%. Most contaminants produced from blood cultures are indigenous human microbial flora. Careful skin practice is an important factor in reducing the rate of blood culture contamination.
To learn more about blood culture contamination visit the link
brainly.com/question/1426959
#SPJ4
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
