Answer:
$147,000
Explanation:
According to the historical cost principle, the assets of the company should be recorded at the purchase price or acquisition price in the financial statements
Since in the given situations many values are given with respect to the acquisition done by the seller, for tax turquoises, etc
But it is recorded at the purchase price i.e $147,000
Answer:
C) twelve weeks of unpaid family or medical leave during any twelve-month period.
Explanation:
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 provides employees with temporary medical leave when:
- their child is born (or they adopt a child) and they must take care of him/her
- if their spouse (husband or wife), child under 18, or parent has a serious health condition
- when the employee himself/herself has a serious medical condition and cannot work
Answer: (a) $295 million
(b) $326 million
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales = $900 million during 2016
Cash = $871 million
Cost of goods sold = $280 million
Expenses for the year totaled = $325 million
Paid for Inventory = $375 million
Paid for everything else = $285 million
Beginning cash = $115 million
(a) Net Income = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Expenses for the year totaled
= $900 - $280 - $325
= $295 million
(b) Carter's cash balance at the end of 2016:
= Cash + Beginning cash - Paid for Inventory - Paid for everything else
= $871 + $115 - $375 - $285
= $326 million
Answer:
The misstatement is immaterial in the overall context of the financial statements.
Explanation:
An immaterial misstatement is an omission that has not been treated correctly but is not significant enough to negatively influence the use of the financial statements or the decisions made by those using them. This immaterial misstatements do not represent fraud or intentional wrongdoing.
Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
