Answer:
A peaceful transition of power is a central tenet of American democracy.
Explanation:
The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
If Jessica keeps on paying all the bills and does something special by spending money on her stuff, then Paul might get sad and feel uncomfortable and guilty.
Money is often the root cause of couples drifting away from each other. If only one partner spends all the money and the other is incapable of doing so, then they may feel offended at times, and this can cause some rift between them which can affect their relationship negatively. It is very important for the partners to share the bills or contribute proportionally to their income. It can reduce misunderstandings too and hence bring positivity between them. Equity theory focuses on determining whether the distribution of resources is fair to both relational partners in a rational manner. It also suggests that employee motivation at work is driven largely by their sense of fairness and proportion. It simply focuses on the idea that both inputs and outcomes of any exchange process should be proportional in nature.
Learn more about Equity theory at:
brainly.com/question/3771927
#SPJ4
Answer:
GOOD: American culture expands to all conquered and acquired territories. Everyone who lives in these territories was able to benefit from religion, democracy, and cultural ways of Americans. Manifest Destiny increased goods, doubled the land area of the U.S., services, and wealth.
BAD:
was their destiny to expand caused Americans to disregard the territorial rights of Native Americans, wiping out many tribes and causing a cultural divide, tension and wars.
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
