The "melting pot<span>" metaphor implies both an</span><span> intermarriage of ethnicities as well as <em>melting </em>of cultures. Some of the ideals of the American melting pot include sharing of ideas to create a unified culture. Overall there is cultural diversity. These ideals still remain up to this day.
Racial diversity is very much present in the United States and biracial intermarriages are more common.</span>
Answer:
Let the public fend for themselves.
Explanation:
Matorrales or substances such as minerals, forest, water, and fertile Lang that occur in nature and can be used for GROWTH
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
During their initial planning session, Michelle's group has divided up who will work on each of the Civil War leaders. Trent will study Robert E. Lee; Skye will study Ulysses Grant; Lionel will focus on
Abraham Lincoln; and Lisa will complete the puzzle by studying Jefferson Davis. Then they will come back and share what they learned with each other. Without knowing anything else, which cooperative learning method do you think this sounds most like?
A. STAD
B. Jigsaw
C. Learning Together
D. Group Investigation
E. Cooperative Scripting
Answer:
The cooperative learning method they are using is B. jigsaw.
Explanation:
In a jigsaw method of learning, students are dependent on each other for their learning to succeed. In the same group, different students are supposed to research and learn about one subtopic of the general topic. Later, students exchange knowledge, as if they are putting together the pieces (subtopics) of a puzzle (general topic). It can also be performed by entire groups in one classroom - that is, each group learns about a different aspect of the topic, and then the groups share the information they acquired.
We can safely say Michelle's groups is employing the jigsaw method, since each one of them will learn about a different Civil War leader to, later, share their knowledge with their group mates.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It has been proven throughout the years, that even if countries are socially democratic, the goverments always think about their own advantage. As a result, they would sell, without hesitation, private properties to people who have the money to pay them.