Media coverage gives voters an impression of the candidates.
Because much of media coverage comes in very brief news segments and even short "sound bites," it tends to provide an impression of the candidates, without necessarily providing in-depth presentation and analysis of their views. This varies, of course, depending on which "media" you have in mind with the question. Committed news organizations which employ highly skilled journalists will do deeper pieces on candidates and their views or policies -- see, for instance, articles in The New York Times or Washington Post or The Atlantic.
There are many new forms of media--such as social media websites and politically-aligned cable networks--where people can go to get biased perspectives and be told how to vote or not to vote. But the most respected media outets strive to present a full picture and cover all candidates. Still, because most voters will watch or read only portions of news media coverage, the best answer is that media tends to give voters an impression of candidates -- which sometimes is less complete than the full picture.
Answer:
The answer is B: It was about five times as expensive as it was in 2000.
Explanation:
I just took the test.
Answer:
He used common Colonial language to make colonies understand and unite.
Explanation:
Thomas Paine played a significant role by publishing pamphlet named Common Sense, which encouraged the colonists to think of the present situations and to fight against the British. In Common Sense, Paine argued about politics and talked about moral. His pamphlets became the source for the colonists to come together as patriots to fight for their independence. The reason for the colonist to remain loyal to Britain was the benefits, which included naval protection, free-trading area, easy credit, cheap manufactures, etc. Paine urges colonies to progress without British support and think about good for the community. According to Paine, he denounced the monarchy and argued for equality.
Answer:
1920s and early 1930 the Nazis gathered enough electoral support to become the largest political party in the Reichstag and Hitler blend of political acuity converted the party non majority but plurality status into effective governing power.
im probably wrong but this might help
