1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
5

Who killed jose rizal

History
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
5 0
<span> The answer is Rizal was killed by Filipino soldiers! Lower rank soldiers who were the Filipino soldiers killed him because if they won't, higher ranking Spanish soldiers who were at their back will shoot them instead.

hopes this helps u ;)</span>
You might be interested in
Who was the commander of the Loyalists troops at Kings Mountain?
Kamila [148]
It was led by <span>Major </span>Patrick Ferguson. 
7 0
3 years ago
What five components make up culture and which do you think is the most important in defining culture? Why?
egoroff_w [7]

Hi..

here's your answer...

<em>The major elements of culture are symbols, language, norms, values, and artifacts. Language makes effective social interaction possible and influences how people conceive of concepts and objects.</em>

Thank you!

3 0
3 years ago
What term did historians apply to Reagan’s efforts on the economic front?
Studentka2010 [4]
The term was Reaganomics
3 0
3 years ago
A strong legislative body, Congress, includes
Alborosie
D: decide on state laws
7 0
3 years ago
Why has it become difficult for member of congress to compromise
sveta [45]

Answer: Political compromise is difficult in American democracy even though no one doubts it is necessary. It is difficult for many reasons, including the recent increase in political polarization that has been widely criticized. We argue that the resistance to compromise cannot be fully appreciated without understanding its source in the democratic process itself, especially as conducted in the U.S. The incursion of campaigning into governing in American democracy--the so called "permanent campaign"--encourages political attitudes and arguments that make compromise more difficult. These constitute what we call the uncompromising mindset, characterized by politicians' standing on principle and mistrusting opponents. This mindset is conducive to campaigning, but not to governing, because it stands in the way of necessary change and thereby biases the democratic process in favor of the status quo. The uncompromising mindset can be kept in check by an opposite cluster of attitudes and arguments--the compromising mindset--that inclines politicians to adapt their principles and respect their opponents. This mindset is more appropriate for governing, because it enables politicians more readily to recognize and act on opportunities for desirable compromise. We explore the dynamics of these mindsets by examining the processes that led to the compromises on tax reform in 1986 and health care reform in 2010.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did US President Jimmy Carter refuse to repatriate the Shah back to Iran?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a difference between the French and<br> American revolutions?
    12·2 answers
  • Description: What are stem cells? Where do stem cells come from? Why are they important?
    6·2 answers
  • Hich statement about the Inquisition and the Renaissance is correct?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the plebeians demand that Roman law be written down
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following organizations worked primarily for women’s suffrage?
    7·1 answer
  • How were cities in the north changing during the 1800s
    8·1 answer
  • What decade was considered the “prime era" for television?
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the circumstances leading to the outbreak of <br>Revolutionary protest in France​
    15·1 answer
  • How did charles v and phillip ii expand the spanish state.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!