Answer: Rivers
Explanation: i do not know what you want from this so uh i just took a stab at it
Answer:
In the first version of the poem, the dashes connect different sections, perhaps to reflect that the events or images described are taking place in quick succession. The dashes might also signify abrupt shifts of thought or the unpredictability of human life.
The version with the dashes seems to have an uneven rhythm, with pauses and breaks; the version with commas, semicolons, and periods lacks this effect, and it sounds flatter than the other version.
In the revised version, the poem ends with a period instead of a dash, again changing the interpretation of the poem: the dash suggests that something is to follow, while a period suggests closure or finality.
Dickinson also capitalizes seemingly minor words, such as Recess, Ring, and Gown. Perhaps she uses this form of capitalization to emphasize the words' symbolic significance or the images they create. When the capitals are removed, the symbolism in the poem seems weaker.
This is FALSE, based on general knowledge of language arts and literacy.
Introductions can be many things, it does NOT ALWAYS HAVE TO start with a question.
Hope this helps. <3
The present-tense verb in the sentence is "teach."
The reason for this is, while "will see," "learned," and "lived" are all verbs as well, "will see" is future-tense; as the word "will" implies that it hasn't happened yet and has yet to happen, while "learned" and "lived" are past-tense, as the "-ed" implies that it already has happened--as the speaker of the sentence has already lived in Paris (and perhaps does not any longer) and learned French while they lived there. "Teach" is implying that it is going to happen at this instance, as there is no "will" in front of it to imply future-tense, and no "-ed" at the end to imply past-tense.
I hope this helped !!
Answer:
2/30
Please mark brainliest I really need it
Explanation:
Hope it helped :)
