1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tom [10]
3 years ago
10

An insurance company purchases a perpetuity-due providing a geometric series of quarterly payments for a price of 100,000 based

on an annual effective interest rate of i. The first and second quarterly payments are 2000 and 2010, respectively. Calculate i.
Business
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
7 0
Wow I calculated I this is wow
You might be interested in
Tina and Bob formed the TB Partnership four years ago. Because they decided the company needed some expertise in multimedia pres
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

$25,000 will be an ordinary income(FMV)

Explanation:

Kate received an offer of unrestricted partnership capital interest for the expertise services. so, Kate recognizes it's an "ordinary income"which should be booked at the fair market value of the partnership interest so offered.

i.e $25,000 is ordinary income (FMV)

6 0
2 years ago
On January 2, 2009, L Co. issued at par $20,000 of 4% bonds convertible in total into 1,000 shares of L's common stock. No bonds
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The correct answer is $1.2 per share.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:

Interest expense of Bonds = $20,000 × 4% = $800

Now, Interest expense of Bond, After tax = $800 × ( 1 - 50%) = $800 × 0.50

= $400

So, we can calculate the diluted earning by using following formula:

Diluted Earning = (Net income + Interest expense after tax) ÷ Total outstanding shares outstanding

Where, Total outstanding shares = 1,000 shares + 1,000 shares = 2,000 shares

By putting the value, we get

Diluted earning = ($2000 + $400 ) ÷ 2,000

= $1.2 per share

4 0
2 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
2 years ago
Mobile phones have evolved from devices intended to place and receive phone calls into handheld multimedia communications device
Bumek [7]

Answer: creeping featurism

       

Explanation: Creeping featurism is a slang used for the term feature creep. It refers to the problem faced by the consumers due to continuous addition of features in an existing product. These addition make the product more complex and hard to use for the users.

In the given case, some customers of mobile phone have a belief that the new features added to the phones have made it complex and less reliable.

     Thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of creeping featurism.

7 0
3 years ago
The Rivoli Company has no debt outstanding, and its financial position is given by the following data:
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

Intrinsic value is $45

Explanation:

The starting point to determining Rivoli Company intrinsic value is to compute the earning after tax as shown below:

Earnings after tax=earning before tax*(1-tax rate)

earnings before tax is $600,000

tax rate

earnings after tax=$600,000*(1-0.25)

                               =$600,000*0.75

                               =$450,000

Then we need to compute earnings per share;

Earnings per shares=earnings after tax/weighted average number of shares

                                 =$450,000/100,000

                                =$4.5

Intrinsic value=earnings per share/cost of equity

  cost of equity is 10%

intrinsic value=$4.5/10%

                      =$45

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which company's advertisements were known for the quote "can you hear me now?
    15·1 answer
  • Moses is working on a kibbutz in Israel where all the members have the same standard of living and they equally divide the profi
    10·1 answer
  • A ________ is a list of duties and capabilities required for a particular job.
    13·1 answer
  • The market for pizza is perfectly competitive and has​ 1,000 firms. Each firm is identical. Describe each firm in​ long-run equi
    10·1 answer
  • Under ASC 606, the transaction price generally should be adjusted for the effect of the time value of money when
    15·1 answer
  • All of the following are examples of a commodity except
    6·2 answers
  • Yale Company purchased equipment having an invoice price of $21,500. The terms of sale were 2/10, n/30, and Yale paid within the
    11·1 answer
  • where cost is in dollars and time is in minutes. The cost of driving an automobile is $5.50 with a travel time of 21 minutes, wh
    15·2 answers
  • The mode of transportation that results in the lowest transportation cost will also lower total costs for a supply chain.
    15·1 answer
  • Wayo was interested in taking classes to become a certified yoga instructor. In order to earn the certification, he found out he
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!