A company has net income of $ 225,000 and declares and pays dividends in the amount of $ 75,000 .
c. An increase of $ 150,000 is the net impact on retained earnings is the correct option.
Income is the consumption and savings opportunity that a business captures within a specific time frame, usually expressed in money. Income is difficult to define conceptually and definitions vary by region.
For most people, income means gross income in the form of wages and salaries, return on investment, pension payments, and other income.
The definition of income is the amount of money received by an individual, group or business during a specified period. An example of income is an annual salary of $70,000.
Learn more about income here:brainly.com/question/25745683
#SPJ4
Answer:
As the bank manager, Steve should be informed that the promissory note met all conditions and the case cannot be seen in the same light as a fraud case because the bank had no reasons to suspect any kind of fraudulent activity as everything was filled correctly and no sign of tampering on the note, it was a genuine and verified promissory note. Aside from the amount and signature, there was nothing in the note to show the agreement that both Steve and Henry had, which is not going above $5,000.
So the bank has the right to collect all its money from Steve, it is a form of negligence on the part of Steve to leave the amount blank which Henry took advantage of.
Although Steve could sue Henry for going above the amount they both agreed on.
Answer: $50,000
Explanation:
Based on the scenario in the question, Jocelyn's basis in the property contributed will be:
Land = $60,000
Inventory = $5,000
Total = $65,000
We are told that the exchange is tax-free, hence, Jocelyn has income of $0.
Therefore, Jocelyn’s basis in Zion’s Corporation stock will be her original basis in property contributed which is $65,000 plus the gain of $0 and then we deduct the liability that was assumed by the corporation which $15,000. This will now be:
= $65,000 + 0 - $15,000
=$50,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Straight-line depreciation is higher than double-declining-balance depreciation in the later years.
Explanation:
With the straight-line approach, depreciation is distributed equally during the life cycle of an asset. While using the double-declining-balance approach, a higher amount of depreciation is allocated during the first years while the asset is highly used and the depreciation reduces as long as the life of the asset ends.
Thus, <em>given a certain asset, the depreciation with the double-declining-balance will be minimum at a later age but evenly distributed using the straight-line method. Then, the amount of depreciation with the straight-line method is likely to be higher.</em>
Answer:
C) The theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
The theory of Comparative Advantage is a theory of international trade and it comes into effect in a situation where the <u>opportunity cost of producing a good or offering by a service by a country is lower than that of other countries. </u>
Specifically, to understand the theory of comparative advantage the opportunity cost of production or offering a service has to be measured in terms of the trade off between those countries. It simply means when a country has the comparative advantage then it derives more benefits from other countries buying its products as compared to buying their products and vice versa.
In the question, the European Union has the Comparative advantage over South Africa because the trade-off between buying South Africa's edible fruits and nuts and selling other products to South Africa benefits the European countries.
European countries derive more benefits because South Africa buys their goods at a cost higher than it takes them to produce while they buy at the normal cost from South Africa. The <u>trade-off benefits Europe </u>
