Answer:
The correct answer is 842.1 Pesos and 941.18 Pesos.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Price of Jeans = $80
So, if exchange rate is $0.095 = 1 pesos
Then pesos required to buy that jeans can be calculated as follows:
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.095
= 842.1 Pesos
And if 1 Pesos = $0.085, then
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.085
= 941.18 Pesos
Answer:
$90
Explanation:
Nominal GDP is GDP calculated using current year prices.
Nominal GDP = current year prices x unit of output
18 x $5 = $90
Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year
Answer:
mutualism
Explanation:
because both animals in the relationship benefit
Evidence of one's claim to authority or competence, such as a diploma, degree, certification, or license is known as the credential.
<h3>What is the evidence?</h3>
Evidence is the term that means to show or to prove that a particular thing is true or is in existence. For better understanding, a few illustrations can be taken. Like They found evidence of a robbery, in the room footprints of three persons present, and many more.
In any courtroom for making the case strong, one has to present evidence that is real like fingerprints, blood samples, DNA, a knife, a gun, and other physical objects.
There are basically two types of evidence, which include Oral and Documentary evidence. Documents that include electronic records are documentary evidence.
Thus, all the names given in the statement are of documentary evidence or credential.
Learn more about evidence from here:
brainly.com/question/6764645
#SPJ1
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
