By matching each example to its corresponding stimulus or response, we have the following:
Unconditioned Response: vomiting;
- This is a condition or actions that occur without learning it. It is inborn.
Unconditioned Stimulus: food poisoning;
- This is a form of stimulus that results in a natural reaction without forcing it or intentionally doing it.
Conditioned Response: refusal to eat;
- This is a type of response that is learned. It is intentionally done by the subject.
Conditioned Stimulus: a taste of the chicken salad
- This is often considered a neutral stimulus initially but later turns to a learned response over time.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are different forms of taste aversion experienced in living things, particularly humans and animals.
The available options are the following
Stimulus
- Unconditioned Response:
- Unconditioned Stimulus:
- Conditioned Response:
- Conditioned Stimulus:
Examples
- a taste of the chicken salad
- refusal to eat
- vomiting food poisoning
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19843671
Answer:For these people, it was a time of 4) downward mobility
Explanation:
Downward mobility – occurs when people come down to lower classes based on social classes that they were original born under. In the late 40s and 50s they were plenty managerial opportunities that arised for certain individuals from certainly groups however with time these opportunities are getting over filled and these individuals are parents already which means their kids who come after them no longer have spaces to fill in the upper positions but to take lower positions that are available to them. Then finding themselves in lower social ranks as compared to those of their fathers.
Based on the survey conducted since 1940, the racial attitudes that were held against the white and Americans have changed tremendously. However, the changes are very complicated than they are assumed. Many different policies have been acquired to fight racism equality.
First is the desegregation of schools that was conducted to prevent house discrimination from promoting change. The national, racial climate has also experienced changes however the question remains if there has been a change in the American hearts.
Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
The Christians want to win back the holy land and the pope wishes to see the holy land under Christian rule so they set up the crusade. There was also a King's Crusade which the pope set up.
Not sure if it is right.
