Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
Answer: The purpose of laws is rules of conduct, usually found enacted in the form of statutes that regulate relationships between people and also between parties
Explanation:
hope this helps :D
Answer:
d. Forcing
Explanation:
Forcing technique: The term "forcing technique" is described as one of the different techniques of conflict resolution in which an individual tends to use some power or formal authority that he or she possesses in order to satisfy his or her concern in the absence of any regard associated with the party or person with whom he or she in conflict with.
In the question above, the given statement represents the forcing technique of conflict resolution.
Answer:
spatial reasoning
Explanation:
Spatial reasoning is a term that refers to the concept of aptitude to create and manipulate visual mental representations. It is related to the ability to visualize and to reason distances and buildings. As Aaron can discern what is far or near his home and can conclude that the sports complex where he wants to take tennis lessons is near the house where he lives, it is possible to see that Aaron has developed the ability to refer to spatial reasoning.
