Answer:
Value of one right = $2.63
Explanation:
<em>A right issue is the issue of additional new shares to existing shareholders in proportion to their existing shareholdings at a price less than the current market price.</em>
<em>The value of rights is the difference between the theoretical ex-right price and the right price . </em>
Value of rights= Theoretical ex-right price - Right price
<em>The theoretical ex-right price is the price at which a share is expected to settle after the right issue assuming all the rights are taken</em>
Theoretical ex-rights price = Total value of shares after right issue/Number of shares after right issues
<em />
1 unit of old share at $25.25 = $25.25
I unit of right share at $20.00= <u>$20.00</u>
Total value of 2 shares <u>$ 45.25</u>
Theoretical ex-rights price = 45.25/2 =$22.63
Theoretical ex-rights price=$22.63
Value of rights= Theoretical ex-right price - Right price
= 22.63 - 20.00
Value of one right = $2.63
<span>The element of the promotional mix that coca-cola is using in this scenario is known as sales promotion. As coca-cola is paying for this inadvertently via their cost of goods accounts.</span>
10,000-15,000 american dollars
The correct answer to this question is that:
In a monopoly, “the monopolist
must lower the price on all units to sell one more unit of output”.
This means that in a monopoly market,
if we increase the amount of output without lowering the price, the marginal
revenue decreases. Therefore marginal revenue is indirectly proportional to
number of outputs.
In a perfect competition however, the
marginal revenue is constant to any amount of output.
<span> </span>
Answer:
1. Distributive issues
2. Integrative issues
3. Congruent issues
Explanation:
Typically, for every negotiation process, any of the three kinds of issues are involved, this includes the following distributive, congruent, and integrative issues.
Hence, Negotiations often involve three types of issues. For DISTRIBUTIVE issues, the parties' preferences are directly opposed. For INTEGRATIVE issues, the parties have directionally-opposed preferences but value the issues differently. For CONGRUENT issues, the parties have the same preferences.
