Answer:
e. A positive economic statement can be proved; a normative statement cannot.
Explanation:
A positive economic statement are objective statement that can be tested, amended or rejected by referring to available evidence.
this means in essence that a positive economic statement is prone to improvement when proven. it is not rigid
a normative statement is subjective that cannot be changed. it is rigid.
Answer:
It will be difficult for Mary to compare the crime rates in a U.S. city with her hometown of London, England:
b. There are differences in the way crime is measured.
Explanation:
- The option a is not correct as it is not true that England doesn't have any crime statistics that are available to civilians.
- The option b is correct as the ways of measuring crimes are different for different regions or places.
- The option c is not correct as there is no dictatorship in England.
- The option d is not correct as it is not true that only solved cases are included in England's crime rates.
Answer:
<u>Current Ratio = 2; Yes</u>
Explanation:
First, to solve for current ratio, simply divide the current assets by the current liabilities.
So the current ratio would be $30,000 / $15,000 resulting to <em><u>2</u></em>
Now, a current ratio greater than one means that <u>Mister Ribs will be able to pay its current liabilities as they come due in the next year.</u>
However, because the current ratio at any one time is just a snapshot, it is usually not a complete representation of a company’s liquidity or solvency.
Answer:
Soooooooooooooo the examples of secondary consumers include bluegill, small fish, crayfish and frogs.
Explanation:
Answer:
D) visibly punish unethical acts
Explanation:
Ethics is the act of knowing what ia right and doing same. That is a good ethical act.
The ethical culture practised by Pam's company is to visibly punish unethical acts. This entails punishing any unethical act appropriately before others to see it.
This approach is really good because it will make others to sit up bearing in mind that they will get same punishment without hesitation if they err.
Pam's organization firing the three managers caught using the company's resources to fund their personal lifestyle pointed towards applying visible punishment for unethical acts.
