Answer:
Chuck must be less than $260,000
Explanation:
The economic decision rule is: Do it if that marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost and Since Chuck was unwilling to purchase the house at $260,000, we can deduce that the marginal benefit of purchasing the house must be less than $260,000 due to the fact that the seller turns down the offer but says she will sell the house for $260,000.
Answer:
Explanation:
If I was Frank I wouldn’t have disclosed the information from one company to the next, it is unethical and with an NDA information shouldn’t be passed on. Even though, it may have been an opportunity for the company he got hired and a threat to the company he disclosed the information from.
Answer and Explanation:
The calculation of the adjusted price that could use for these two comps in a CMA is given below:
For Comp property A, the value of the garage should be
= $452,500 + $4,500
= $457,000
And, for comp property B, the value of the pool should be
= $446,000 + $5,000
= $451,000
In this way, it should be considered
Answer:
The correct option is E,Ted's annuity has a higher present value than Allison's
Explanation:
Both annuities do not have equal amount today as $1000 received today is higher in value terms than $1000 receivable in a month's time since cash receivable earlier is much more valued than the one receivable later.
Ted's annuity is an annuity due not an ordinary annuity
Allison's annuity is an ordinary annuity not annuity due
Allison's annuity has a lower present value than Ted's and not the other way round.
The only correct statement is option E,since Ted is expected to receive $1000 today, his annuity has a higher present value compared to Allison's
