Answer:
15 admentment
Explanation:
if you read the 15th amemdment that is the princbal of voting
<u>Opening statement</u>
In an era where we are all connected and can view all of the world's events through the news, we come to understand and draw upon opinions that could affect the laws in place. In 1990, Congress passes the Gun-Free School Zone Act, or GFSZA for short, to reduce violence on a national level. However, this sparked debates on whether or not such a umbrella law would impede on individual state's law making rights. Congress, however, has the power to create general laws (as such as the GFSZA) that is aimed at protecting students and teachers a like. [You will add a general list of what you would bring up to support it here.]
-- Your reasons and historical examples, personal-experiences, historical laws --
<u>Closing statement</u>
--You will restate the general reasonings here -- Schools are allowed to make it's own choices that guarantee the safety of the students and teachers that attend there alike. The GFSZA is the step in the right direction in guaranteeing such safety, and with adequate funding for the protection of students, it can lead to a secure place for people to learn. Congress, as such, has the power to pass the GFSZA.
<span>Instead, in 1857, in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, the United States Supreme Court declared that all blacks — regardless of whether they were slaves or free men — were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also ruled that the 1820 Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.</span><span>Dec 13, 2010</span>
The correct answer is B. Citizens could lose their freedom
Explanation:
Absolute monarchy implies the monarch has unlimited or unrestricted power, which often leads to citizens' oppression and tyranny because there are no organizations or branches of government that can protect citizens. This idea is explained by Montesquieu as he states united powers exerted by the same person lead to apprehensions and lack of liberty "there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise". Moreover, Montesquieu explains an absolute monarch would create and enact tyrannical laws according to his interests "should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner." In this context, one of the consequences of this government is the loss of freedom (option B).
