What was the overall tone of Lewis's speech? What parts of Lewis's speech were changed? Why?

1 answer:

8 0

The overall tone of Lewis' speech was angry and strong. For some, the speech sounded too belligerent. John Lewis changed parts of his speech at the request of Martin Luther King, Jr. Lewis said he could not say no to King because King was his hero, his inspiration.
The part where Lewis said they cannot wholeheartedly support the administration's civil rights bill for it is too little and too late was removed from his revised speech.
Lewis' original speech "We will march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did" was changed to "we will march with the spirit of love and with the spirit of dignity that we have shown here today"

You might be interested in

How did isolationism act as a deterrent to U.S. participation in the war?

Elenna [48]

The answer is B) Americans did not want to get involved in another war in Europe. and C) <span>Americans felt that the distance between them and the war would keep them safe. I did the test and I got 100% have a great day</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 13 of 20

skelet666 [1.2K]

The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.

Explanation

Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.

Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.

6 0

3 years ago

How were missions in<br> Texas a success?

Lady bird [3.3K]

I would have no clue i don’t live in texas hint misiones equal 6

5 0

3 years ago

How did the Bourbon Triumvirate hurt Georgia?

Assoli18 [71]

The Bourbon Triumvirate hurted Georgia because they did not:

really help the poor
improve education
improve lives of the convicts

<h3>Who were Bourbon Triumvirate?</h3>

The Bourbon Triumvirate referred to Joseph Brown, John Gordon and Alfred Colquitt; who were group of wealthy men that led the Georgia Democrats and tried to help the wealthy, white citizens of Georgia during the New South.

Despite that the Bourbon Triumvirate wanted the state of Georgia to become self-sufficient, they were not too successful at it.