Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
Sohan invested Rs 80000 in the beginning of his firm. After six months, Mohan invested Rs. 65,000 to become a partner. Sohan put his money into investments for 12 months, while Mohan made investments for 6 months. They made a total profit of Rs. 20,000 after a year. The portion of Sohan in the profit that he made is 14222.
One way to assess a company's success is through its profit. Its simplest definition is the sum that remains after deducting all expenses from all revenues. The remaining funds, or your profits, can either be retained by the company and reinvested to fund future expansion, or they can be given as a draw or dividends to shareholders.
To learn more about share of profit here
https://brainly.in/question/47628097
#SPJ4
Answer:
Annual payment= $3,250.77
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You are thinking of purchasing a home. The house costs $300,000. You have $43,000 in cash that you can use as a down payment on the house, but you need to borrow the rest of the purchase price. The bank is offering a 30-year mortgage that requires annual payments and has an interest rate of 6% per year.
FV= 300,000 - 43,000= $257,000
i=6%
n= 30
Annual payment= ?
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (257,000*0.06)/{[1.06^30]-1}= $3,250.77
It really depends as to what they do and how long they do it for I would say it ranges person to person
Answer:
Under CAPM:
Re = Rf + Beta(Rm - Rf)
Rf = 5%
Rm - Rf = 6%
Beta = 1.25
Re = 5% + (1.25 x 6%) = 12.5%
Under dividend discount model:
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Div₁ = $1.20
P₀ = $35
g = 8%
Re = ($1.20 / $35) + 8% = 11.43%
Under bond yield plus risk premium approach:
Re = Pre-tax cost of debt + risk premium over its own debt
Pre-tax cost of debt = 7%
risk premium over its own debt = 4%
Re = 7% + 4% = 11%
The highest cost of equity results from the CAPM model and it is 12.5% while the lowest results from using the bond yield plus risk approach (11%), the difference is 1.5% between them.
