Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
TALDOGS stand for
Title
Author
Legend
Date
Orietation
Grid
Scale
I'm sorry I could answer the second part, I don't know what map you are talking about.
Answer He went to 2 different schools Syracuse University and the university of delaware.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be option B. Transitional Argument. The second sentence in this paragraph is an example of a transitional argument. What makes this sentence a transitional argument because of the introductory word "fortunately" which signals a transition of ideas in the paragraph.
