1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Molodets [167]
3 years ago
7

ASAP

History
1 answer:
Verdich [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. Abolitionist

Explanation: I learned this in history on txvais

You might be interested in
The Supreme Court has placed limits on the freedom of the press. Answer the following questions about libel, slander, and prior
Serhud [2]

Answer:

There are four elements a person must establish in order to prove he or she has been defamed:

Publication,

Identification,

Harm and.

Fault.

To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement.

Explanation:

please mark this answer as the brainlest

5 0
3 years ago
What methods does Lynch endorse in dealing with slaves? What would the goal be of these methods?
Romashka [77]

Answer:

hello

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What has the telephone enabled us to do?
sesenic [268]
Communicate with other peope
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Munich Pact did which of the
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

i think it B sorry if im wrong tho

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Diferencia entre juzgar y explicar
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

<em>(English) The only difference between a judgment and an opinion is the existence of evidence to support an opinion therefore making it final or absolute. There is nothing wrong with a judgment of this type, however, the problem arises when we judge others in an aggressive tone.</em>

<em></em>

<em>(Spanish) La única diferencia entre un juicio y una opinión es la existencia de evidencia para respaldar una opinión, por lo que es definitiva o absoluta. No hay nada de malo en un juicio de este tipo, sin embargo, el problema surge cuando juzgamos a los demás en un tono agresivo.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution?
    9·2 answers
  • Waldo is traveling is in SE Asia (Middle East). He is in a country east of Iran and it is landlocked which means Waldo won't be
    6·1 answer
  • QUICK paper currency was a symbol representing gold, silver, and the governments's promise to pay. true or false?
    11·2 answers
  • Who are widely thought to be the earliest inhabitants of India? Indo-Europeans. Sindhis. Tajiks. Dravidians.
    6·1 answer
  • Describe Sophocles in one sentence​
    8·1 answer
  • What are the three main commonalities between all “Abrahamic religions”?
    5·1 answer
  • This passage comes from the memoirs of us president harry s. truman, who made the decision to use the atomic bomb. which of thes
    8·1 answer
  • Which group in the Roman Republic's government was made up mostly of patricians and voted to pass laws?​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of President Reagan’s economic plan? *
    7·1 answer
  • Which element of Manifest Destiny is reflected in the following statement?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!