Answer:
C
Explanation:
The passage is mainly saying that people with self-interest (designing men) will create political divisions between districts to benefit themselves personally by causing tension and disagreements that are not natural and only respect the geography of manipulation. The districts should not be separated by interests that they have in common, but certain people will make sure that this is the case.
Answer:
He was not paid by the bank.
Explanation:
I think I did that right, so passive moves the subject to the front, and the rest should just fall into place
hope this helps:)
After reading "Stories Saved My Life" and analyzing its central idea, we can select the following option:
C) Even though Bird did not feel supported in school, he found his way as a storyteller after connecting with his Ojibwe roots.
<h3>What is the article about?</h3>
In "Stories Saved My Life," James Bird central idea concerns how he learned in a different way from other students and how he only understood that after spending time his Ojibwe relatives.
Bird suffered throughout school as he was told there was something wrong with him. His brain learned in a different way, but teachers and doctors did not know what to do to help him. Bird ended up leaving school.
However, while spending times with his relatives of the Ojibwe tribe, Bird realized there was nothing wrong with him. He simply could not learn the way schools expect him to. He learned best from storytelling. Understanding that about himself changed his whole life and led him to become a great artist.
With the information above in mind, we can choose letter C as the best option concerning the article's central idea.
Learn more about "Stories Saved My Life" here:
brainly.com/question/26392819
A credible narrator or reliable narrator will tell the story from the point of view of the truth, it does not matter if she or he has any attachment to what is going on in the story, readers can trust their words and understand the circumstances the way they the story unfolds. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator will tell their story from their point of view, they will embelish their deeds, hide or down play their problems, therefore the reader will always have the impression that the unreliable narrator is conducing the reader to trust them.
The crediable narrator will bring the facts to the reader and put the reader in the story, the reader can have the feeling of engagement on the narration. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator brings the uncertainty feeling tothe reader and the reader can dot the i's as they please because they know they cannot fully trust the narrator.
