Answer:
If you are talking about biology, this is one example:
Explanation:
Both the siamese cat and the Himalayan rabbit illustrate how heredity interacts wit the environment. In both cases, temperature of the environment affects the genes of color
The reason why the INF treaty was an important change in the Cold War arms race was that It cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
<h3>What did the INF treaty do?</h3>
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was a treaty that was signed in 1887 between Ronald Reagan and the Mikhail Gorbechev of the Soviet Union that saw both nations agreeing to reduce their nuclear stockpiles.
This deal led to both the United States and the Soviet Union dismantling thousands of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces missiles which would have decimated Europe had both nations gone to war.
The treaty also allowed for American and Soviet officials to go to both nations and inspect their military bases for compliance in what was a historic agreement.
In conclusion, the INF treaty cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
Find out more on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at brainly.com/question/11888991
#SPJ1
George Washington, the one on the dollar bill
Answer:
In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:
"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.
