1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tekilochka [14]
4 years ago
5

What was a result of U.S. trade with Germany in 1914?

History
1 answer:
Tems11 [23]4 years ago
6 0
Germany was the first belligerent country to take steps to control the purchase and distribution of raw materials.[15] In August 1914, Walther Rathenau (1867-1922), administrator of the electric company AEG (Allgemeine Elektrizitäts-Gesellschaft), warned the army that the country had no supply program and would shortly experience a lack of munitions. The War Raw Materials Department (Kriegsrohstoffabteilung or KRA) was set up few days later. This department was led by Rathenau himself, who chose his colleagues as the industrial and financial leaders. They were in charge of controlling the requisitioning and allocating of raw materials needed by the armament industry. This creation was the first step toward total mobilisation for war.

To make sure raw materials were delivered to the firms that needed them, the KRA created twenty-five War Raw Materials Corporations (Kriegsrohstoffgesellschaften). Each dealt with specific products such as chemicals, metals, wool, leather, etc., which they had to buy, store, and distribute. They corporations represented the private consumers and thus the industrial interests. The companies fought for the property and control of each of these corporations, since they gave their shareholders advantages and lower prices thanks to state interventions.

The KRA was under the Ministry of War's authority and the power of the army kept increasing throughout the war. In August 1916, the Hindenburg Programme demanded that all available resources be used to increase the armament output. All issues related to the war economy were centralised in the War Office. While preparing the Hindenburg Programme, the War Office had not focused on transports or coal supplies. Therefore, by the end of 1916 the country lacked fuel and trains. In March 1917, a coal commissar was given the charge of allocating coal to every consumer. His powers were quite expansive: although he could not always make the decision to close a factory, he could refuse to send it the coal it needed. In the last year of the war, it appeared that the coal resources would not be sufficient to fulfil all the armament needs nor the civilian and railways ones. The War Office made the decision to prioritize the military requirements.[16] As a result, the Hindenburg Programme and the coal commissar let no raw materials nor manufactured goods go to the civil population, whose situation worsened until the end of the war.

You might be interested in
Identify six things that states discussed including in their constitutions.
avanturin [10]
Free speech.
right to bear arms.
right to day in court.
entry with lawful warrants.
abolition of slaves.
right to vote.


3 0
3 years ago
how did Thomas Paine use concepts of equality,reason, and nature to critizize he legitimacy of monarchical goverments and Britis
Mrrafil [7]
He was an activist who studied the enlightenment and he wrote pamphlets which one of them was named "common sense" which showed his criticism of the British control.
3 0
3 years ago
Where did Muhammad and his followers go when they left Mecca? Babylon Cairo Jerusalem Medina
musickatia [10]
He went to Medina, this event is known as the <em>hijra </em>and he embarked on said journey in the year 622. Which on the Muslim calendar, is year 1. However, what is of particular interest is that the city is also referred to as Yathrib and "Medina" means "The city" when translated to English. 
7 0
3 years ago
Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct!
Vika [28.1K]
It’s A NOW GO ANSWER MY QUESTION GUYS
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was society, economic, and political life like in Europe in the middle ages
nordsb [41]
The middle ages in Europe were pretty terrible. Politically, kings ruled directly over groups of people, or over whole countries. The kings answered to the Pope generally. Economically, the kings and their nobles owned most of the profits of hard labor, while the townspeople after were treated to low wages.  A sizable gap between classes was seen economically, and there was little room for changes in a persons economic class. Socially, the structure went like this: beggars and thieves, serfs (or non land owning peasants), knights, nobles and bishops, kings, the Pope. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did adding candles to the birthday cake originate
    12·2 answers
  • How did Galileos work come into conflict with the church, and how was that conflict resolved
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions did Japan take in an attempt to recover from the Great Depression?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the Great Migration during World War I?
    13·1 answer
  • The main occupation of the Middle Colonies was
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes the early years of the reign of the Mauryan emperor Ashoka?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following IS NOT a contributing factor that led to the economic boom in America
    15·2 answers
  • How do the Oligarchy of ancient greece keep their power?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how to pretreat a stain
    13·1 answer
  • Neutrons eluded discovery until the 1930’s because:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!