Answer:
b. The abstract and the first paragraph of the discussion.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Greeks joined clinical and clinical life structures hypothesis from the Egyptians, which, in this sense, assumed a vital part in preparing for the improvement of the anatomical sciences (Loukas et al., 2011; Standring, 2006). Galen (129–199 AD) and Aristotle are typically viewed as the dads of life structures (Russel, 1916; Singer, 2005; Leroi, 2014). However, Galen's human life systems were frequently off-base, since he never dismembered people, in any event not to the public information. The way of life of human analyzation grew essentially in the Christian West, rather than the Greco‐Roman culture of the dead body, in which the human body was viewed as debased (Park, 2006). Indeed, Galen based his depictions of human life structures on analyzations of creatures, for example, sheep, bulls, pigs, canines, bears, and especially the "Barbary gorilla," an Old World monkey (Macaca Sylvanus) that has a minimal tail and subsequently cursorily appears to be a primate in this regard (Singer, 2005, 2016; Cole, 1975). Since the life systems of this monkey are altogether different from that of people, especially concerning delicate tissues, for example, muscles (Diogo and Wood, 2012), verifiable blunders had large amounts of Galen's depictions of human life structures. For example, he didn't depict the two most curious muscles of the human forelimb, the flexor pollicis longus, and extensor pollicis brevis, as unmistakable muscles (more models given in Supporting Information Table 1). Also, aside from such exact depictions of macaques that are mistaken for people, he incorrectly portrayed highlights that are comparative in people and macaques, adding to additional blunders about human life structures. For instance, he didn't perceive the extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus as discrete muscles (Supporting Information Table 1).
Explanation:
Brainliest :)
There have been many valid accounts of children who were raised by animals in the wild.
True
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: i know things
Considering the situation described above, as a graphic to describe this model to her audience Tessa could use an "<u>iceberg to represent the mind with the part representing the conscious out of the water."</u>
This is because Freud's topographical theory is categorized into three which are:
- Conscious level: this is at the top like an iceberg.
- Subconscious level: this is in the middle, like the top of the water.
- Unconscious level: this is the bottom like the water body itself.
Freud's topographical theory deals with mental elements in the interpretation of dreams.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>iceberg to represent the mind with the part representing the conscious out of the water."</u>
Learn more about Topographical theory here: brainly.com/question/17805943
