First off, the controversy of this had led to an imbalance in congress among the number of free states and slave states. So this rules out our first option. Due to it not being all of the above, that's our fourth answer ruled out as well. The Webster speech did not happen for 10 more years so it is very unlikely that this is what led to that speech. Even without the process of elimination, it would be B because the Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state in order to preserve the balance of power in congress. Also, Henry Clay (the Great Compromiser) drafted this.
Answer:
things that happend in 1984 UK and China agree on Hong Kong. Poison gas escapes from Union Carbide factories.
300 people die when Indian Army attacks the Sikh Temple.
Moderates win elections in El Salvador.
AIDS breaks out.
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation:
i just took it and got it right
Progressives, such as Woodrow Wilson believed the nation’s financial system was overly controlled by <u>big businesses.</u> Therefore, the correct statement is Option D.
<h3>Who was Woodrow Wilson?</h3><h3> </h3>
Thomas Woodrow Wilson became an American politician and educator who served as the twenty-eighth president of the US from 1913 to 1921.
A member of the Democratic Party, Wilson served as the president of Princeton University and the governor of New Jersey earlier than prevailing in the 1912 presidential election.
Therefore, Progressives, such as Woodrow Wilson believed the nation’s financial system was overly controlled by <u>big businesses.</u> the correct statement is Option D.
learn more about Woodrow Wilson:
brainly.com/question/4112868
#SPJ1
Answer:
The populist moment of 2016 drove multiple academic disciplines together in a
Kierkegaardian way. They realized that complacently living life forward in liberal
democracies now required an understanding life backwards of in terms of tribalism and
identity. An emerging consensus—that multiple ethnic identities should be contained within a
greater single civic/creedal identity—highlighted an enduring tension between two ready
components in sports: gamesmanship (the tribal reality of winning, mostly through
professionalism) and sportsmanship (the rule-of-law ideal of playing well, ideally through
amateurism). American football’s unique provenance as a highly commercial and physical
game within higher education’s ideals of intellectual and noncommercial educational
excellence, offers a unique study of the power of gamesmanship to shape sportsmanship while
illuminating its realistic and historic contained boundaries. This study anchors the
Explanation: