1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
13

Which best explains how the Supremacy Clause is connected to federalism?

History
2 answers:
vfiekz [6]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Supremacy clause is the clause in Article six of the united states constitution which declares that federal laws have the jurisdictional authority over the state laws whenever there is a conflict between the laws established by these two bodies. The supremacy clause is important for Federalism as according to the clause the US constitution is pre- eminent law of the land to which all people must comply. Without the supremacy clause, the federal government would not have been able to enforce equal justice to all people, especially in the cases when the state constitution allows for discrimination.

aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
7 0
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the federal government has more power than state governments.

You might be interested in
Should presidents be allowed to use executive orders to change policy, such as the minimum wage for federal contractors, or shou
raketka [301]

Answer:

It is your decision on if it is right, but I will give insight on the very basics of how our government deals with power distribution and why. And a touch of opinion. Happy New Year!

Explanation:

Giving the president the power of executive authority would make our government the same as a dictatorial one. That is one of the main reasons our government has 3 branches, it’s a checks and balances system that keeps those in power relying on each other to make decisions. The question of if it is right that a president should or shouldn’t have executive authority has raged on every since America first considered becoming independent from Britain, but based on the numerous times a British monarch given executive authority abused it, we can guess the same thing could easily happen with our president. At the very least a president should not have full freedom in passing policies, but the real difficult question is “To what extent should a president be able to pass policies, and congress oversee the affairs of the president?” This question applies to not just the president and Congress, but also the judicial branch and state governments. It’s a tough question.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a factor that contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union
andrey2020 [161]

Answer: A) High income intake versus debt

Explanation: Having a high income to debt ratio is actually good for an economy, boosting the GDP and ensuring a debt crisis doesn't occur. The Soviet Union, however had the opposite, with a high debt to income ratio.

4 0
3 years ago
New inventions, designs or ideas of the 1780s.
horrorfan [7]
Some new inventions, designs and ideas that were created in the 1780s include:

-1780 Bifocal glasses were invented by Benjamin Franklin

-1780 The circular saw was invented by Gervinus

-1784 The threshing machine was invented by Andrew Meikle

-1786 The steamboat was invented by John Fitch

-1785 The working parachute was invented by Blanchard

-1785 The power loom was invented by Edmund Cartwright


Hope this helps! :)
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following conclusions can best be drawn about the ability of Congress to prevent the Civil War? Congress was comple
OverLord2011 [107]

Congress was completely ineffective in preventing the Civil War because the Southern states still seceded. This option is best drawn because of the fact that that in the case of the 2nd option, they did not delay the war in any way. It was only a matter of time until the war happened, and nothing could have stopped it from happening. Once the Southern states made the decision to secede, the war was inevitable.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the dictators of European countries in the 1920s and 30s
GuDViN [60]

This site might help you find the answer.


https://sites.google.com/a/pitt.k12.nc.us/world-history-wwii-online-textbook/rise-of-european-dictators

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who had the most power in a town meeting in colonial New England?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the booking process in Florida
    10·1 answer
  • Explain why Diderot hated Boucher's work.
    14·2 answers
  • What organized roman law into an orderly body of rules?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the empire decline after the death of marcus aurelius in<br> a.d. 180?
    14·2 answers
  • what is the purpose of the United Nations and what five nations were given the most power in it after the war​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the answer I think it's vaunted or annihilated
    8·2 answers
  • Define self-advocacy and resourcefulness. How are these two words connected?
    9·1 answer
  • PLease change this to different words.
    15·1 answer
  • How did wars between European powers impact Tennessee?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!