It would be tone. Tone is like scared tone sad tone ex
The Acts of Union were two Acts of Parliament: the Union with Scotland Act 1706 passed by the Parliament of England, and the Union with England Act passed in 1707 by the Parliament of Scotland.
They put into effect the terms of the Treaty of Union that had been agreed on 22 July 1706, following negotiation between commissioners representing the parliaments of the two countries.
By the two Acts, the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland—which at the time were separate states with separate legislatures, but with the same monarch—were, in the words of the Treaty, "United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain".
The two countries had shared a monarch since the Union of the Crowns in 1603 when King James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne from his double first cousin twice removed, Queen Elizabeth I.
Although described as a Union of Crowns, until 1707 there were, in fact, two separate Crowns resting on the same head (as opposed to the implied creation of a single Crown and a single Kingdom, exemplified by the later Kingdom of Great Britain).
There had been three attempts in 1606, 1667, and 1689 to unite the two countries by Acts of Parliament, but it was not until the early 18th century that both political establishments came to support the idea, albeit for different reasons.
The Acts took effect on 1 May 1707. On this date, the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united to form the Parliament of Great Britain, based in the Palace of Westminster in London, the home of the English Parliament.
Hence, the Acts are referred to as the Union of the Parliaments.
On the Union, the historian Simon Schama said "What began as a hostile merger, would end in a full partnership in the most powerful going concern in the world ... it was one of the most astonishing transformations in European history."
So I'm guessing, that the answer is D.
<span>
"Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector."
Hoped I helped! Please correct me if I was incorrect. Thanks!
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which of the following is a criticism of globalization? would be, B: Diminished sovereignity of governments.
Explanation:
In general terms, globalizarion has had good, but also really bad, effects. On the good side of it, globalization has made the world a much smaller place, with much more in common between its inhabitants than there ever was. As such, and thanks to technological advancement and the erasing of certain boundaries which prevented people from different regions from interacting actively, people today from one end of the earth can interact, befriend, and get to know people from the other end. Cultures have also become mixed with one another, erasing certain limitations and boundaries that did not permit interrelationships before. However, globalization has also had its downsides. One of them, unquestionably, has been the loss of sovereignity and even national identity. Due to an exaggerated number of treaties and agrements, all in the name of globalization, and being part of the global village, countries have become tied to the global opinion, and the global interference, especially of those countries who are the most powerful and dominant in the group.
Assuming you're referring to the Great Compromise in the United States, it was very important because it satisfied both the large and small states (in terms of population) regarding how they would be represented in Congress.
Answer:
Although rovers and satellites can teach us a lot, scientist have found a cheaper, more convenient place to study Mars: the Earth. Planetary geologists like Dr. Jim Zimbelman study remote regions on Earth to learn about what early Mars may have been like. (These regions are called analogues.)
