The One-Person One-Vote Rule refers to the rule that one person's voting power ought to be roughly equivalent to another person's within the same state. The rule comes up in the context of Equal Protection. The most relevant Supreme Court case is Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).
I would say Brutus because he said that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. I may be wrong and if I am please tell me.
Protection of unwarranted search and seizure were violated. They both searched through his record and took his phone without any just reason or proof. They had not
probable cause.
The election campaign of 1800 was very different from the political campaigns we see today.
Neither Adams nor Jefferson traveled around the country to gather support. Many thought direct campaigning improper for a person who would be president.
Instead, hundreds of letters were sent to leading citizens and newspapers to make candidates' views public.
The campaign was bitterly fought. Each side made personal attacks against the other.
For example, Federalists accused Jefferson, who believed in freedom of religion, of being "godless." Republicans warned that the Federalists favored the wealthy and would bring back monarchy.
So that one branch is unable to take full power.
The reason the constitution was created was to give the people of America a voice, instead of being ruled by a single person making all the decisions. The different branches are designed so that a large group of people are able to balance their power and make decisions based on what the general public wants and needs.
