Answer:
bad boy/girl, no cheating
anwer is 1.
Explanation:
Prevent the incalculable loss of life it would take to invade mainland japan.
Answer:
The political effects of the Prohibition were people discontent, uprising of organized crime and constant maniestation against the ban.
Explanation:
The prohibition was the nationwide ban on sale and import of intoxicating beverages established in the eighteenth amendment. It lasted from 1920 to 1933 and it was abolished by another amendment.
First of all, the effects of it politically were that in the first place crime aroused, then a big number of people who believed it was unfair started to work against the amendment and illegal traffic of intoxicating beverages unleashed. The Prohibition had many flaws because it didn't punish or banned consumption so many people amazed big amounts of alcohol and drinks. Also, organized crime took the opportunity to create wealth and gather simpatisants. But population discontent was the biggest effect. Leading people to support a move against prohibition and to act against orders.
After the big depression started, the government couldn't afford to let a tax pass by and people to push further in the topic. So after many promotions by supporters, the prohibition stopped and everyone got something positive out of it.
Answer: A, D, E
Explanation:I Hope it helps that is the answer because it is :) No but seriously it is the answer
Answer:
Explanation:
Why the News Is Not the Truth
by Peter Vanderwicken
From the Magazine (May–June 1995)
Tweet
Post
Share
Save
Buy Copies
Print
News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works, Paul H. Weaver (The Free Press, 1994).
Who Stole the News?: Why We Can’t Keep Up with What Happens in the World, Mort Rosenblum (John Wiley & Sons, 1993).
Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact in America, Cynthia Crossen (Simon & Schuster, 1994).
The U.S. press, like the U.S. government, is a corrupt and troubled institution. Corrupt not so much in the sense that it accepts bribes but in a systemic sense. It fails to do what it claims to do, what it should do, and what society expects it to do.
The news media and the government are entwined in a vicious circle of mutual manipulation, mythmaking, and self-interest. Journalists need crises to dramatize news, and government officials need to appear to be responding to crises. Too often, the crises are not really crises but joint fabrications. The two institutions have become so ensnared in a symbiotic web of lies that the news media are unable to tell the public what is true and the government is unable to govern effectively. That is the thesis advanced by Paul H. Weaver, a former political scientist (at Harvard University), journalist (at Fortune magazine), and corporate communications executive (at Ford Motor Company), in his provocative analysis entitled News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works.
