Answer:
median 88 first 84 third 92
Step-by-step explanation:
Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
Answer:
c) at most 11.1%
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the data that is 97 ± 12, with 97 being the mean and 12 the standard deviation.
Now, the percentage of people who reached them for less than 73 dollars, if it were a normal distribution:
z = (73 - 97) / 12 = - 2
so it would be, a probability of 0.0228 or 0.228%.
But we don't know what distribution it has, but we can get an idea.
A and D discarded, as they are very high values, and 73 is well below the average.
B) is still a very high value.
Therefore the answer is C, at most 11.1%
Answer: Distributivo
Step-by-step explanation:
2*3 = 6
2 * x = 2x
Therefore:
2(3+x) = 6 + 2x
Answer:
0 2
1 4 ⟌ 3 7
- 0
3 7
- 2 8
9
2 r 9
for 37 divided by 14
0 7
1 3 ⟌ 9 6
- 0
9 6
- 9 1
5
7 r 5
for 96 divided by 13
0 2 0
4 1 ⟌ 8 5 8
- 0
8 5
- 8 2
3 8
- 0
3 8
for 858 divided by 41
20 r 38
Step-by-step explanation:
