Truth to be told, the Americans did not react immediately to the Quartering Act. Nor were they violent in response, at first.
In the end, The Quartering Act was received as "another example" of the Tyranny of Britain and of how they would use any excuse to get more money from the colonies. In the end, the USA would have fought for its independence anyways. If not then, later, but no country in the world remained a colony of the Europeans forever.
The Americans had plenty of reasons to plot a revolution and to fight for independence. This, The Quartering Act, was just one more reason.
A. Rule by all people being governed
That would be C.
The overall outcome of the war was threefold: the trial<span> and </span>execution of Charles I<span> (1649); the exile of his son, Charles II (1651); and the replacement of </span>English monarchy<span> with, at first, the </span>Commonwealth of England<span>(1649–1653) and then </span>the Protectorate<span> under the personal rule of </span>Oliver Cromwell<span> (1653–1658) and subsequently his son </span>Richard<span> (1658–1659). The monopoly of the </span>Church of England<span> on Christian worship in England ended with the victors' consolidating the established </span>Protestant Ascendancy<span> in Ireland. Constitutionally, the wars established the precedent that an English monarch cannot govern without </span>Parliament<span>'s consent, although the idea of Parliament as the ruling power of England was only legally established as part of the </span>Glorious Revolution<span> in 1688</span>
Answer:
In a democracy the government has less control over how people spend their time and what they believe. People are free to join clubs, political parties and other groups. In a dictatorship there's just one leader who has total control over the party and the country.
Explanation:
Answer for ¿what are the characters that make up Chinese writing? : Ideograms
