Our well-being can be influenced by constructive and destructive relations. Constructive relationships can continue to strengthen our character and how we communicate with others. In the other hand, our self-esteem or our relations with other people can be destroyed by destructive relations. Depending on the kinds of relations we have, such relationships will affect your well-being positively or negatively.
Explanation:
Constructive relations are relations in which roles are flexible, there is "mutual respect" for relations & "open communication". These are a few elements of a strong communication. This results in a happier and healthy well-being. There is a positive effect on the persons involved in the relationship and such relationship make the lives of people healthier and peaceful. Also, a constructive relation portrays strong "mutual understanding" between two people.
On the other hand, destructive or toxic relation are distinguished by selfish intentions and lack of respect for others wellbeing. These relations must be stopped. This contributes to a very "poor health" which may lead to problems with "mental health". In such relationships there is no "mutual understanding", which creates a big difference in the relationship between people leading to tension, anxiety and depression. It is usually impossible to get out while you are in a destructive relationship but it may be achieved with proper support.
Answer:
The correct option is B: Collection of individuals who share at least one common characteristic
Explanation:
A population is simply a large collection of people or object aimed at being the focal point of a query or discovery. It can also be defined as a collection of individuals or object who share similar or common characteristics. Hence, researchers do not so much rely on the population, but mainly rely on the sampling techniques used for the research.
I believe it would be Republican party influence in that region.
The republican party held more tendency to display patriotical value that shown through sacrifice in battle field.
According to poll, more than 2/3 of the soldier that enlisted to the army are affiliated tot he Republican party.
Answer:
The statement means that the small nation is home to many diverse cultures, civilizations, and tribes who all call it home and grow up, co-existing amongst themselves in harmony.
Explanation:
The statement that<em> "Nepal is a common garden of many castes, cultures, and civilizations"</em> means that the country is like a garden that houses a variety of tribes and cultures without any specific tribe or caste being allowed to reside alone. The statement is a metaphor, comparing Nepal with a garden that is made up of mixed varieties of tribes and cultures.
Though small the country may be, it is home to many tribes, many different cultures living peacefully, co-existing, and growing up together. It is a peaceful ground for the numerous cultures to grow up and develop, at the same time co-existing amongst themselves. Without a single tribe, a single civilization, or a single culture dominating or living in it, the complex yet mixed nature is what makes this small country a great example of secularity.
Answer:True ,this is the strength of the weak ties
Explanation:Weak ties refers to those people we are not so close with like a stranger you meet at a restaurant and they hear your conversation about looking for a job and they approach you about an available offer in their company, this person has strengthened the weak ties because eventhough you are not that close to them but their reference has given you a great opportunity. The strength of weak ties then means getting help from a stranger just like Martha couldn't get any help from her family but an old classmate was able to help her eventhough they don't have an ly close ties.