Answer:
d. All of the above are correct.
Explanation:
The people who are looking for job are considered unemployed for the time they are seeking for a job.
Also, from the person perspective is looking for a job which matches their expectation. So it will be looking until find something suitable for their desires.
If all works were the same then, it would be no job search as all the workers will apply for the same job and called from the pool of workers when needed.
The scenario described above is a third party endorsement. It is a third party endorsement because, the original marker of the check, that is, Tina, signed the check over to someone else who has the choice whether to deposit it or cash it at bank.
Chief Executives is the answer
Answer:
The correct answer is Allocative efficiency.
Explanation:
Although there are different evaluation standards for the concept of allocation efficiency, the basic principle states that, in any economic system, the different options in the allocation of resources will produce both "winners" and "losers" in relation to the choice being evaluated. The principles of rational choice theory, individual maximization, utilitarianism and market theory assume, in addition, that the results for both winners and losers can be identified, compared and measured.
From these basic premises, the objective of maximizing the efficiency in the allocation can be defined according to some neutral principle in which some options are considered “objectively better than others”. For example, an economist might say that a change in policy increases the efficiency of allocation, as long as those who benefit from the change (winners) earn more than the losers lose.
------
NOTE: If you need to extend the explanation given, you can make a comment or add a new question. I will be very pleased to help you.
That would be considered as "design flexibility"