1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fenix001 [56]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following was a Social Darwinist argument in favor of Western imperialism? A. Westerners thought they had a duty to

bring their civilization to inferior races. B. Western nations needed outlets for their growing populations. C. Increased trade would benefit all peoples. D. Colonies would bring wealth and prestige to the home country.
History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
3 0
A. Westerners thought they had a duty to bring their civilization to inferior races.
You might be interested in
Describe the research of charles darwin
Lunna [17]

The theory of natural selection was explored by 19th-century naturalist Charles Darwin. Natural selection explains how the genetic traits of a species may change over time. This may lead to speciation, the formation of a distinct new species.

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the New World colonies and Europe?
dlinn [17]
<span>D.Europe relied on raw materials from the New World. The colonies relied on manufactured goods from Europe.

Please mark as brainliest answer </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Hamilton's problem with articles of confederation<br>​
alekssr [168]

Answer:

One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
African Americans had a huge interest in the outcome of this war because a Northern victory would mean what?
NISA [10]
In summary, it would mean that slavery would be abolished, and that the nation would be in fact united, with (supposedly, it actually took a very long time for this to happen considering the KKK attacks) less racism in the U.S.
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
The answer is B. :)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLS HELP IS DUE TONIGHT, The 2020 Census will help inform decisions on how __________ of dollars are allocated (Spent, shared, u
    5·2 answers
  • Base your answer to question 14 on the passage
    5·1 answer
  • Turned from Christianity and became a muslim
    7·1 answer
  • Roosevelt's New Deal included laws that gave workers
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes slavery in ancient Rome? A. Slavery was banned throughout ancient Rome. B. About twenty-five perc
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the battle of Great Britain happen?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help fast am having trouble, ty
    11·1 answer
  • Socrates wrote more than 200 books explaining his ideas A.True B.False
    6·2 answers
  • Defina republicanos da abolição
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think the people of Italy, Germany, and Japan listed to and followed radicals like Mussolini and Hitler?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!