1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
2 years ago
9

What was one way Reagan’s speech and his other foreign policy stances affected the Cold War?

History
1 answer:
s2008m [1.1K]2 years ago
8 0
Reagan pushed Cold War tensions and military spending--his rhetoric convinced Americans there was still a serious threat from the USSR and therefore justified an increase to military spending which forced the USSR to respond contributing to their economic decline and eventual collapse. 
You might be interested in
Please HelllppppWhat was one of Japan's major achievements?
Xelga [282]

Answer:

"B. Creating some of the earliest works of prose literature"

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the good of Westward Expansion outweigh the bad?
VikaD [51]

No the good of Westward Expansion cannot be said to outweigh its bad.

<h3>What was the westward expansion?</h3>

In the 19th century, the westward expansion was the term used to describe the movement of settlers, farmers and other persons down west of America. These areas were already occupied by the original owners. They were pushed out of their lands and it was taken over by the settlers.

This is the major reason why the expansion can be said to be bad. The fact that they took over areas that belonged to others forcefully.

The settlers took the places where the natives lived and farmed. Thy did this and set up their own ranches and economy in the areas that others once owned. Then the homestead act also gave them the rights to own the properties. All of these are the reasons why i  do not consider this expansion as good. I see it as unfair and cruel.

Read more on the westward expansion here: brainly.com/question/245803

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Proslavery settlers who came to Kansas from Missouri in the 1800s were known as
allochka39001 [22]
B.) Border Ruffians.
Abolitionists didn't agree with slavery.
Free-Soilers were members of the Free-Soil party.
Slaveholders were just slave holders in the South. This is only wrong because they were the slaveholders in the South that stayed in the South.

Hope this helps! (:
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did advancements in technology and warfare impact the ratio of military to civilian casualties from world war l to World war
VARVARA [1.3K]
Civilians were not able to do anything, so they were killed the same ratio to military that fought the enemy. There was also no rules or laws that they can’t kill civilians
3 0
3 years ago
The lands that would eventually be Oklahoma became part of the United States through the _____.
mart [117]

Answer:  Louisiana Purchase of 1803.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two sentences best describe the effects of the agreements at the Congress of Vienna?
    13·1 answer
  • Do you know the reasons behind use of date in history?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the fascist system of government reduce the impact of the Great Depression in Germany during the 1930s?
    14·2 answers
  • What right did the English nobles gain from King John signing the Magna Carta? Parliament would be required to meet once a year.
    7·2 answers
  • How would the tariffs affect industrial workers?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the Annapolis Convention?
    14·2 answers
  • Were the effects of the war of 1812 mostly negative for the United States?
    15·2 answers
  • Can you guys answer this question please thanks will give brainliest
    8·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE BRALIEST IF CORRECT!!!!!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • What type of goverment ruled the society? How did it work? How were laws made in Athens
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!