<u>Answer:
</u>
One limitation on the President's foreign policy power is that he can make foreign treaties but he has to present them in from of the Senate for approval. The branch of government that places this check on the President’s foreign policy power is thus, the United States Congress.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the President of the United States serves as the supreme head of the government, the principles of distribution of power and checks and balances are ultimately applied to him too.
- This distribution of power is deemed to be necessary as it prevents an individual from overpowering the majority of officials that work under him.
- Hence, the foreign policy power of the President can thus be deemed to be 'limited'.
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
She takes long break from work and shirks her responsibility.
Explanation:
D) Based on equity theory, employees who perceive inequity can change his or her inputs at will. Therefore they evert less effort if they are underpaid, or exert more effort if they are overpaid. If Megan takes long breaks from work and shirks her responsibilities, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by reducing her inputs. If Megan had told her boss for a raise by citing her years of experience with such company, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by changing her outcomes. If she then decidesto interrupts her fellows and refuses to let her get any work done, then this would mean that she is trying to reduce her colleague's inputs. The argument is neither strengthened nor weakened by the fact that she accepts extra responsibilities but fails to carry them out properly.
<span>This is continuous reinforcement, as opposed to intermittent reinforcement. The reinforcers can be apportioned based upon a fixed ratio (after every "x" responses, for example) or a fixed interval (every "x" seconds, minutes, days, or other time frame). As with any type of reinforcement, this can be either positive (in which something is given to the learner) or negative (in which something is removed from the learner).</span>
Because they dont understannd it
