1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
3 years ago
6

Help Needed ASAP

History
2 answers:
Aleks04 [339]3 years ago
3 0
Martin Luther King jr spoke of non-violence so it'll be him
dem82 [27]3 years ago
3 0
Most likely martin Luther king jr because his movements were inspired by Gandhi himself.
You might be interested in
How do you think reuniting the United States after the civil war should have happened?
Margaret [11]

Answer:In 1861, the United States faced its greatest crisis to that time. The northern and southern states had become less and less alike--socially, economically, politically. The North had become increasingly industrial and commercial while the South had remained largely agricultural. More important than these differences, however, was African-American slavery. The "peculiar institution," more than any other single thing, separated the South from the North. Northerners generally wanted to limit the spread of slavery; some wanted to abolish it altogether. Southerners generally wanted to maintain and even expand the institution. Thus, slavery became the focal

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
CAN someone help me with a history question?
zlopas [31]
I will help u 
  with your  question

8 0
2 years ago
What was not true about the economy at the end of world war 2
shtirl [24]
The correct answer here - that wasn't true for the economies at the end of the World War II was that the GNP and corporate profits doubled. 

What did happen though was that almost every country that was involved in this conflict found its resources to be mostly depleted and this in no way meant that corporate profits were being doubled.  Hope this helps!!!
6 0
2 years ago
Analyze the economic interdependence needed for Sumerian states to produce this artifact.
kirza4 [7]
The Sumerians in Mesopotamia near the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers being among the first civilized well-developed agricultural nations in the world, learned from the Ubaidians. The latter people were a strong creative force at one time who gave rise to such things as weaving, masonry and pottery which could explain the origins of artifacts like the one shown above here.
6 0
3 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help I gave the passage to give more info please help me plz soon I have to go plz answer quickly thank you!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Look at the diagram below.
    6·2 answers
  • What is the best meaning of “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains i need answers
    11·2 answers
  • which of the following is not associated with the, kamakura period in japan. A. Samurai swords play B. Pacifism C. The rise of Z
    9·1 answer
  • What effect did these innovations have on the war?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the Silk Road benefit China during the Yuan dynasty? Choose three correct answers.
    6·2 answers
  • Why were the suburbs developed?
    15·1 answer
  • How did postwar negotiations at the end of World War I ultimately contribute to the start of World War II? In your response, exp
    11·1 answer
  • Does Hamilton believe that people are naturally good citizens? Explain you answer.
    7·1 answer
  • Read and write a summary about this article.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!