Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
One solution (z = -1)
Discussion:
-2(z+3)-z=-z-4(z+2) =>
-2z -6 -z = -z -4z - 8 =>
-3z -6 = -5z -8 => add 6 to both sides
-2z = -5z -2 => add 5z to both sides
3z = -5z +5z -3 =>
3z = -3 =>
z = -1
Thank you,
MrB
3 is the least common multiple
Step-by-step explanation:
2(4 – 16) – (–30) 2(–12) – (–30) 24 – (–30) 54= 2×4-2×16 -×-30×2×-12-×-30×24-×-30= 8-32+30-24+30×24+30: 732
Answer:
- vertical scaling by a factor of -4
- horizontal translation 5 units left
- vertical translation 11 units up
Step-by-step explanation:
We notice that the multiplier of the squared term in f(x) is 0.5; in g(x), it is -2, so is a factor of -4 times that in f(x).
If we scale f(x) by a factor of -4, we get ...
-4f(x) = -2(x -2)² -12
In order for the squared quantity to be x+3, we have to add 5 to the value that is squared in f(x). That is, x -2 must become x +3. We have to replace x with (x+5) to do that, so ...
(x+5) -2 = x +3
The replacement of x with x+5 amounts to a translation of 5 units to the left.
We note that the added constant after our scaling changes from +3 to -12. Instead, we want it to be -1, so we must add 11 to the scaled function. That translates it upward by 11 units.
The attached graph shows the scaled and translated function g(x):
g(x) = -4f(x +5) +11
Answer:M is M=-0.75 and +72 and N is n= -1.3M+96
Step-by-step explanation: