Answer:
negative
Step-by-step explanation:
positive * positive = positive
negative * positive = negative
negative * positive = negative
Answer:
Probability of having broken glass = 0.1933
Probability of not having broken glass = 0.8067
Step-by-step explanation:
The Treatment table in the file attached to the given question is written out and completed below;
Treatment
Response Smashed into Hit Control Total
Yes 16 7 6 29
No 34 43 44 121
Total: 50 50 50 150
Using relative frequencies,
the distribution of responses about whether there was broken glass at the accident for the subjects in this study can be computed as follows:
Probability of having broken glass = 
Probability of having broken glass = 0.1933
Probability of not having broken glass = 
Probability of not having broken glass = 0.8067
Nothing can go into 83 so of you square root it you will get a decimal so the nearest whole number You would get is 9 because 9*9=81 and that's the closet that you will get to 83
It is the same as multiplying by 2/3, the equation being 2/3n n being the number
I draw the two triangles, see the picture attached.
As you can see, angle 1 and 2 are vertically opposite angles because they are formed by the same two crossing lines and they face each other.
Angles <span>ABQ and QPR, as well as angles BAQ and QRP, are alternate interior angles because they are formed by </span><span>two parallel lines crossed by a transversal, and they are inside the two lines on opposite sides of the transversal.</span>
Hence, Allison's correct claims are:
1 = 2 because they are vertically opposite angles. BAQ = QRP because they are alternate interior angles. Therefore Allison, in order to prove her claim, can use the AA similarity theorem: if two angles of a triangle are congruent to two angles of the other triangle, then the two triangles are similar.