1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dalvyx [7]
4 years ago
15

1) How does Hitchcock feel about what he describes as “whodunit or puzzler” movies? (2) Cite evidence that explains Hitchcock’s

point of view toward these kinds of films, and (3) explain what Hitchcock believes is the difference between suspense and surprise.
English
1 answer:
Marat540 [252]4 years ago
3 0

According to Hitchcock, using the resource of puzzling the audience is not the core of suspense. That is why he had never directed a puzzler or a whodunit. We can find evidence from this in an inteview he gave for the Hollywood Reporter in 1948, called 'Let'Em Play God', in which he clearly says: "I do not believe that puzzling the audience is the essence of suspense."

Regarding the difference between surprise and suspense, he explains that a surprise is something that produces a fright in the audice from a sudden. There is no expectation or tension before it because the scene has been created to take them by surprise. Otherwise, when a director creates suspense, the audience is prepared to what it will come, because you make them participate in the scene, you make them part of the situation.

You might be interested in
Please i will mark as brainiest!!!
IceJOKER [234]
I think the answer is the second choice; bashing.
7 0
3 years ago
What is one theme in Flannery O'Connor's "Everything That Rises Must Converge"?
horrorfan [7]
3) In times of crisis, one gains perspective
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
13. Which type of visual aid would you use to compare and contrast information? a line graph a bar graph a pie chart a map
sertanlavr [38]
A bar graph, the bars next to each other help portray the comparison between two groups or categories.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Nitella [24]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube

Kalani’s Argument:  My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.

Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).

Which argument is more convincing?

Answer:

Kalani's argument is more convincing.

Explanation:

Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.

7 0
3 years ago
How did Otto persecute Christoffels? He talked down to Christoffels. He allowed Christoffels to enter a room before him. He loan
siniylev [52]

Answer:

The answers:

He talked down to Christoffels.

He ridiculed and called Christoffels names.

Explanation:

This is in relation to a story in the book "The Hiding Place" authored by Corrie Ten Boom. This story is a biography on Boom's life during the war in Holland.

Otto was a young German who was also a Nazist. He was as an apprentice to Boom's father, who is a watchmaker. When Otto becomes an apprentice under Boom's Father, the family realized the effect of Nazism as Otto proudly often states that he was in the Hitler Youth, and excuses himself during daily scripture reading saying the father is reading the old testament, a "book of Jews" and consists of lies.

At a point in the story, Otto started abusing Christoffel, an old man who also works at the watch shop. Christoffel was always subjected to Otto's violence such that he is being talked down to and ridiculed by him. Sometimes, Otto also trip and hit Christoffel alongside shoving him into a wall. These were some of the ways Otto persecuted and abused Christoffels.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • *** Need help asap 15 points
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of expository writing?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the similarities between Noah from Noah’s ark and Jonas front the giver
    6·1 answer
  • Make some meaningful sentences from the verb 'break' ​
    8·1 answer
  • 2. You should allow extra distance between yourself and a motorcycle during adverse weather conditions.
    10·1 answer
  • How was Cassie’s family different from the other families in the area? (A) They were originally from Illinois. (B) They were wea
    10·2 answers
  • How does Curtis's business succeed even when he cannot read?
    5·1 answer
  • أماه
    10·1 answer
  • Help?!phrase or clause
    5·1 answer
  • What form of narrator has a person tell the story that is watching the events occur, but they do now know the thoughts and feeli
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!