Answer:41
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
32.1% ( depending on question might have to round to 32% )
Step-by-step explanation:
60*52=3210
3210/100= 32.1
8x-24
Hdhsjsjsushsnxjcjjddhhdjdusisksjsn
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
One number be x
x+(x+1)+(x+2)=63
x+x+1+x+2=63
3x+3=63
3x=63-3
3x=60
x=60:3
x=20
smallest number = x=20
middle <span>number = x+1= 20+1=21
</span>largest<span><span><span> number = x+2</span> =20+2= 22</span>
</span>