1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
11

I think teens should play dagerous sports for the following reasons, helps with school, keeps you healthy, and there are ways of

not getting injured
if someone right 3 body paragraphs using the info up top they will get all my points and im NOT JOKING seriously but it has to be good
History
1 answer:
fomenos3 years ago
5 0
I think teens should play dangerous sports for the following reason: it helps with school, keeps you healthy, and there are ways too not getting injured. Here are some reasons why:

Exercising helps keep your body healthy. Most students just sit in desks for a LONG time, which is very unhealthy. Dangerous sports can keep them active. They can aslo be extreme, helping pushing a student's limit on how far they can go, which can boost their confidence. Dangerous sports arent ALWAYS dangerous or bad.

Just becasue they are known as "dangerous" sports does not mean they are always dangerous and someone has to get hurt. If everyone followes the rules, no one will get hurt. Following all instructions can reduce the risk. Students may even have special equipment to reduce the impact of something.

Sports can help with school. Specifically team sports. Students can learn to cooperate with one another in team sports. Students can also focus better. They may also get along with one another more easily when playing team sports. Students may also do better in school, so they can play dangerous sports.

In conclusion, some dangerous sports should be allowed.

You might be interested in
Which of the following events resulted from the assassination of President John F. Kennedy?
ziro4ka [17]
OA the twenty second amendment was passed to clarify succession
4 0
3 years ago
What is a primary source?
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source is an artifact, document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic.

Explanation:

hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Which two territories were ceded to the United States by Spain after the Spanish American war
Bingel [31]

Answer:

Puerto Rico, the Philippines

Explanation:

Hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
What motivated European Imperialism in Africa more - technological development, political reasons, or national pride?
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

They didn't see it as imperialism, they genuinely believed others were "inferior", so I'd say national pride

Explanation:

what I just wrote

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination. H
DedPeter [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If we make a comparison between the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination, we find considerable differences.

During the Red Scare of the 1920s, the federal government of the United States was very concerned about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States territory. That is why US President Woodrow Wilson ordered the Department of Justice to initiate the Palmer Raids to arrest communists and anarchists.

During the Second Red Scare in the times of Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCartney, he accused the presence of communists in the interior of the US federal government and the military. The problem was that he accused but never presented valid evidence.

One way or the other the federal government was worried, concerned, and act in many different ways.

Regarding the fight against racial discrimination, the federal government has acted very differently. It seems that the government is not as interested as in the above-mentioned cases. It seems that it has not the same political interest as in the case of anarchism or communism. Truly, racism is not the first thing on the political agenda of the US.

How involved were citizens in these fights?

Citizens basically reacted with fear during the Red Sacre times. The government and mass media told them to be fearful of communist, and they were afraid. And they started to accuse people with no evidence at all.  

Regarding the fight against racism, here it seems that some US citizens are more concerned about this issue and have actively participated in public demonstrations.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 25 points HELP
    5·2 answers
  • An oversimplification differs from a sound generalization because it:
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following were members of the "Civilized" tribes?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement is most true?
    12·2 answers
  • Please answer ASAP:( I’m having much trouble
    11·1 answer
  • Mt. everest is approximately __________ tall. a : 28,000 ft. b : 29,000 ft. c : 30,000 ft. d : 31,000 ft.
    15·1 answer
  • Did the Eisenhower doctrine place any limits on american assistance
    10·1 answer
  • 3 diff questions part 3
    11·2 answers
  • What are 2 regions that had many important historical events in them?<br><br><br> PLZ HELPPP
    11·1 answer
  • What date did george washington get married
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!