Answer:
x=1
Step-by-step explanation:
-16+x=-15
-16+x+16=-15+16 Add the terms to both sides of the equation.
After that you simplify.
Answer:
A) 370
Explanation:
Answer:
6 possible outcomes, 50% or 3/6 getting the racing bike, 2/6 or 1/3 being red, and 2/6 or 1/3 getting silver bike.
Step-by-step explanation:
racing bike mountain bike
red black silver red black silver
Answer:
6/5
Step-by-step explanation:
hi! when dividing fractions, we use the KCF rule, which stands for keep,change,flip. we keep the first fraction the same, change the division symbol to multiplication, and flip the second fraction to its reciprocal. therefore, we now have:
9/10 * 4/3
now, we can multiply the numerators and denominators.
36/30
we can simplify this.
6/5
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
