The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Please complete your question
The great landowners who became Rome's ruling class were referred to as "Patricians", from the word having to do with "father," whereas the lower class was the "Plebians".
The river Nile left behind rich soil when it flooded. So the correct option for the given question is option "B". The river Nile brought with it very rich soil from other places and deposited them in the flood plains. when the flood water receded, the farmers were able to cultivate the land and get a rich vein of crops for feeding all the people making up the civilization near the river banks of Nile. Every year, with new flooding of the plains, new rich soil is brought abd deposited. The farmers are able to reap great crops in the flood plains of the river Nile every year due to this reason.
The Declaration of Independence was organized into five distinct segments with each segment addressing a particular issue.
