1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irinina [24]
3 years ago
10

Which was not something that imperialist powers sought in southeast asia

History
2 answers:
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
6 0
Tin is the correct answer.
const2013 [10]3 years ago
3 0
<span>Tin is your answer to your question </span>
You might be interested in
64. Many historians say that Reconstruction was both a success and a failure. Give a specific example of both
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

It was a success in my opinion.

Explanation:

Reconstruction was both a success and a failure because the goal of united America was accomplished by defeating the army of Confederate while the goal of implementation of fourteen amendment i. e. providing civil rights to all slaves in the whole country was not accomplished which was a failure of Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a success because it achieved its goal of united America by defeating Confederate army.

7 0
3 years ago
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is charley Crocker the most notoriously corrupt robber baron<br><br> True <br> False
djyliett [7]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Nope he wasnt.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three pros of the use of Agriculture and what are three cons of the use of agriculture (in your own words please )
Luda [366]

Answer:

Farmers have got a new option insofar they will have the freedom to sell their produce outside the APMC (agricultural produce market committee) market and there will be no tax on such trade which will give a higher price to the farmers.

3 0
3 years ago
What is collective learning, and what role did it play in human evolution?
Ahat [919]

Answer:

Here ya go hope it answers all questions

About 200,000 years ago, we evolved to become the most important force for change on the planet. Our knack for collective learning — preserving information, sharing it with one another, and passing it to the next generation — helps us create entirely new forms of complexity.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which were th's native people who dug hundreds of miles of irrigation channels
    14·1 answer
  • Why does the us state department see guatemala's reforms as a threat?
    10·2 answers
  • George Wallace said, “There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.” Was he right?
    15·1 answer
  • What kind of agriculture did the mayan use ?
    10·1 answer
  • What was significance of long parliment
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the reason of the Language Movement in 1952.<br> Y'ALL PLEASE HELP
    6·2 answers
  • 03 the cold war at home the big ideas how did the cold war cause the red scare? how did americans respond to the threat of commu
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Dred Scott decision affect the Missouri compromise? ( ASAP PLEASE )
    9·1 answer
  • Why were masks an important part of ancient West African culture? O They were used as shields during wartime. O They symbolized
    5·2 answers
  • Most soldiers in the Civil War lived in these type of communities before they joined the civil war
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!