Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
A the mailing of firearms act I’m pretty sure
Using confrontation, the nurse could say: "Mr. K., you have said that you don't smoke, but I see that you have an open package of cigarettes in your pocket."
In this scenario of confrontation, the nurse should give her honest assessment regarding the situation as she saw the discrepancy or inconsistency in Mr. K’s statement,
Answer:
d. Insurance contracts are personal contracts.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that the Jacob sold his house to Shelia for $140,000 and at the time of insurance he did not tell about the new owner
So after four months, the sheila purchased the house, and due to windstorm, the roof got damaged
Since at the time of insurance he did not told about the new owner due to which the insurer refused to deny the payment to Sheila and that could be considered as a legal.
So, this situation is considered to be a personal contract
Answer: Gerard experienced a nightmare
Explanation:
Nightmares are scary or unpleasant dreams.