1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fenix001 [56]
3 years ago
10

The Supreme Court justices ruled that Dred Scott did not have a right to sue for his freedom since:

History
2 answers:
Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
6 0
The Supreme Court justices ruled that Dred Scott did not have a right to sue for his freedom since: He was a slave.
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is B. He was a slave

Explanation:

Dred Scott was an enslaved African-American that sue his master to get his freedom and the freedom of his family arguing he had been taken from Missouri that was a territory in which slavery was legal to the Missouri territory which was a territory in which slavery had been banned and where Scott had lived for four years. However, the Supreme Court decided Dred Scott could legally get his freedom because he was a slave and not a citizen and therefore could not sue or be protected by law. Thus, the Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott did not have a right to sue for his freedom because he was a slave.

You might be interested in
How old is the Red Sea?
Sergio [31]

Answer:

20 millions years

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who proposed the first april 22nd earth day celebration in the u. S. ?.
Lisa [10]

Answer:

Senator Gaylord Nelson

4 0
2 years ago
John Marshall insisted the US Constitution was a. the most important document in the US c. the only document worth having b. the
dolphi86 [110]
B. The Supreme Law of the Land
4 0
3 years ago
Which economic system has the most government regulation?
raketka [301]
Command (the second one)
6 0
3 years ago
According to Millar, what powers did the Roman people have? How did that make Rome more democratic?
Arisa [49]

Answer:

Rome contributed to democracy by creating a government where the people ruled. While Rome was a republic and not a democracy, the Romans established the framework for future democratic governments. Rome had senators and tribunes elected by the people to represent their interests.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why president Lincoln wanted the south to attack federal troops
    10·1 answer
  • Identify ONE similarity between the development of the Maya and the residents of Teotihuacan. I REALLY NEED SOMEONE"S HELP PLZ!!
    14·1 answer
  • Select all of the reasons why the English Bill of Rights was important in American history? Select all that apply. A It had a di
    10·2 answers
  • Was the Veto Power supported by Federalist or Anti-Fed? Why?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe what the cotton gin was and explain how it impacted the United States in the early to mid- 1800s
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think some people were exempt from military service during world war 1
    15·2 answers
  • What conditions existed at the start of the Great Depression
    7·2 answers
  • What's the importance of the last super for Christians?
    15·1 answer
  • HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF YOU ARE RIGHT AND IF YOUR ANSWER GIVE ME 100%The St. Bartholomew's day massacre was a bloody eve
    6·2 answers
  • How many states were admitted to the union by 1900
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!