Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
There are a couple of reasons for why the empire didn't last. One of those reasons is that the empire was too great (big). Because the empire was too huge, it was divided into different parts after Alexander's death. He also didn't have an heir to the throne, so when he died, officials fought for power and to become king, which also contributed to the fall of the empire as well.
I read everything and I wish I knew the answer sorry. Hope someone can help you
