Byzantine Empire
Explanation:
- The Eastern Roman Empire (or Byzantine Empire) was the only country on this side of the Chinese Wall that lasted from late antiquity to the end of the Middle Ages.
- It went through the ups and downs and was one of the most significant civilizations in human history. It exerted a great cultural influence on a whole range of medieval states and peoples.
- Unlike the Western Roman Empire, which was overthrown by barbarians in 476 AD, the Eastern Roman Empire continued to live for another thousand years.
- Thanks to the denser population, larger cities, and a stronger economy, it has more easily withstood the economic crisis of the 3rd century, one of the greatest crises known in world history.
- Byzantine Empire rested on three foundations, namely: Roman state system, Greek culture and Christianity. Without any of these three elements it cannot be imagined, and it is only through their permeation that a Byzantine civilization is created. Byzantium, which for centuries was the guardian and restorer of ancient heritage, has no historical successor.
Learn more on Byzantine Empire on
brainly.com/question/2284649
brainly.com/question/1593916
brainly.com/question/629356
#learnwithBrainly
D)<span>"In 2001, agriculture was the largest economic sector in one-third of Georgia's counties, and second in another third of the countries."</span>
Economic activities and religion i think
Answer:
vhbjmn, .
vtugbhilnjkm/Explanation:
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
