'Actual Tigers Company'
Total Assets
$100,000
Stockholder Equity: $30,000
$100,000 - $30,000 = $70,000
$70,000 + $30,000 = $100,000
Total Assets - Equity = $70,000 (total liabilities)
$70,000 + Equity = $100,000 (total assets)
In accounting if we minus the total assets ($100,000) with equity ($30,000) it will always give the "total liabilities" which is (70,000)
Then, adding the "total liabilities" ($70,000) with the equity ($30,000) equals $100,000 equal like as the "total assets"of $100,000
The total assets MUST match the total liabilities. If they don't match then either the calculation of the total assets are inaccurate or the numbers are estimated wrong to recalculate.
Answer:
c. comparative advantage in
Explanation:
In economics, comparative advantage is the advantage a trade party has over the other party, in the production of a a particular good that has a relatively lower opportunity cost. It simply involves exploring the option that has overall best package.
North Carolina has a comparative advantage in sweet potato production relative to Florida, as the opportunity cost involved is lower, since there is little potential benefits North Carolina will get in the production of oranges.
Answer: B. an increase in interest rates that decrease economic growth.
Explanation:
If interest rates were to rise in an Economy, that would mean that the cost of borrowing just rose. The rise in the Cost of Borrowing reduces consumer spending as well as business investment. This will therefore lead to a lower Aggregate demand. A lower AD in the Economy usually leads to a decrease in economic growth.
Now, if such things were to happen, a firm may definitely invest in fewer projects because first off it will be more expensive for them to borrow and invest because of the high rates. They will also be discouraged because of the Decrease in economic growth as the chances of their projects doing well will be drop in a depreciating economy.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
At the end of a common agreement, there is no consequence for any of the parties, since it is their will to end the contract that they previously agreed to sign
Termination of the lease by the lessor.
The lessor may unilaterally terminate the lease under the conditions established by law, paying any compensation that may arise.
The law expressly establishes when and why the lease can be terminated by the lessor, and only in those cases can the contract be terminated without there being room for the payment of a penal clause or non-compliance, if any, since in those cases the law in particular established how and why to terminate the contract, and set the penalties to which there is room.
Do you need help finding a career or do you need help picking a dream I don’t understand what you need help with but I can help
